CourtReady Case Builder
Build your case step by step.
Start with the next useful task. More detailed tools remain available whenever you need them.
Calm Guided Workspace
Guided View keeps the current task clear while Full Workspace preserves every detailed tool.
Secure access
Sign in with your existing CRS account
My Cases
Your CRS account is connected.Select a case to continue building it here.
Welcome to CourtReady
Let’s build your case step by step
You do not need to know which forms, documents or legal issues matter yet. Start with what happened, and CourtReady will help you organise the information.
Five simple steps
What happens next
- 1Choose your case
- 2Tell us what happened
- 3Add what you already have
- 4Check what CourtReady identified
- 5Approve what should enter your case
New matter
Need to create a new case?
Use this only where the matter does not already appear in the list below. The Case Builder will check the case name and case number before creating anything.
Your existing cases
Select an existing CMS case to continue building it without creating a duplicate.
Loading your cases…
Current case
Guided case home
Recommended next step
Continue your case
CourtReady will show the next useful task from the information already recorded.
Why this?
The recommendation is based only on recorded progress, review state and missing information.
Case at a glance
What is recorded now
Organisation overview
How organised is the information?
Information is being recordedThis describes organisation and evidential support only.
More about this case
Open an area when you need it
Case Analysis
Financial remedy analysis
Compare disclosure and replies, organise assets, needs and pensions, assess later financial changes, model settlement scenarios, and track outstanding disclosure, offers, costs and implementation.
Case Builder dashboard
Continue building your case
We will take you to the next incomplete section.
Case-building checklist
Your progress through CourtReady
Status describes the information workflow, not whether the case itself is complete.
Status guide
What each information status means
- Draft
- Information saved in CourtReady but not proposed for publication.
- Proposed
- A possible fact, issue, timeline event or evidence gap identified for review.
- Reviewed
- Information the user has checked and approved.
- Published
- Information written into the selected McKenzieCMS case.
Foundation progress
0% foundation completeness
Not yet saved
Next event
No hearing or deadline recordedAdd the next court date when known.
Available material
0 categories recordedEvidence can be reviewed and linked in later modules.
Immediate focus
Confirm the introductory informationComplete missing sections before moving into evidence-led modules.
Case Intelligence
Evidence-led case overview
Working intelligence is kept separate from McKenzieCMS until you review and expressly approve publication.
0Facts
0Supporting Evidence
0Matters to Resolve
0Information Still Needed
0Publication Queue
Case health
Indicators measure completeness, organisation and evidential support only. They do not assess legal merits or prospects.
0% Overall Case Readiness
Evidence coverage0%
No facts recorded
Timeline coverage0%
No facts recorded
Outstanding issues0
No unresolved matters recorded
Missing information0
No information gaps recorded
Relationship health
These indicators measure organisation and traceability only, not legal strength or case merit.
Asset schedule health
Working indicators identify missing values, evidence and disputed ownership or valuation. They do not assess entitlement.
Structured facts
Statements remain provisional until supported and reviewed.
Publication queue
Nothing in this queue is published automatically.
Case-building sections
Review a completed section or continue from the next incomplete one.
Current case
Current case
Current case
Current case
CourtReady Financial Analysis — first version
Financial Analysis
Build separate applicant and respondent analyses, then compare their disclosed position and projected needs.
ProvisionalNot yet saved
Review required. Automated figures are provisional and must be checked against the page references before use. Forms E are sent to the secure analysis endpoint for this request and are not retained by this module. Calculations are illustrative and are not a prediction of a court outcome.
Automated first review
Analyse both Forms E
Select the applicant and respondent PDFs below, then ask CourtReady to extract provisional figures and page references.
Standalone analysis
Applicant
Current case
Financial analysis
Asset Schedule Analysis
Build an ES2-style Working Asset Schedule. This analytical matrix is not an official ES2 document and does not determine ownership, valuation or legal entitlement.
Asset Schedule Case Health
These indicators measure completeness and evidential organisation only.
Case Totals
Totals use the figures entered in each named column. Liability categories are shown as negative values. No Working Figure is created automatically.
ES2-inspired working matrix
ES2-style Working Asset Schedule
| Notes | Actions |
|---|
Information Still Needed
These are rule-based working prompts. They are not published unless deliberately sent through the Review Centre.
Advanced tools
Current case
Financial analysis
Income, Needs and Affordability Analysis
Compare present and proposed monthly positions without recommending a settlement or predicting a court outcome.
Working analysis only. Figures must be checked against current evidence. Mortgage capacity, tax, benefits, maintenance and pension consequences may require regulated or specialist advice.
Neutral scenario
Current or proposed monthly position
Scenario adjustments are transparent user inputs, not CourtReady recommendations.
Side-by-side working figures
Monthly income and expenditure
| Category | Applicant £/month | Respondent £/month | Applicant source | Respondent source | Evidence date | Notes |
|---|
Calculated comparison
Affordability summary
Totals are calculated from the working inputs and are never automatically published.
Housing and capital requirements
Record assumptions separately for each party. These figures do not determine what is reasonable or affordable.
Information Still Needed
Rule-based prompts identify incomplete or stale inputs. They are not findings and are not published unless deliberately sent through the Review Centre.
Current case
Financial analysis
Pension Analysis
Organise pension values, projected income and evidence without recommending a pension share or predicting a court outcome.
Important limitation. CETV is not the same as retirement income. A percentage calculation does not model scheme benefits, tax, offsetting or actuarial equality. Defined-benefit, public-sector and complex cases may require a Pension on Divorce Expert or regulated financial advice.
Separate capital and income views
Pension comparison
Totals do not imply equivalence or fairness and are never automatically published.
Working schedule
Pension records and scenarios
| Scheme | Owner / type | CETV | Annual income | Evidence | Illustrative scenario | Status | Actions |
|---|
Information Still Needed
Rule-based prompts are not findings. They are not published unless deliberately sent through the Review Centre.
Current case
Financial analysis
Settlement Scenario Analysis
Compare the calculated consequences of named user-entered scenarios without identifying a preferred, fair or likely outcome.
Neutral working analysis. A scenario is not an offer, legal recommendation or prediction. Tax, pension, mortgage, benefit and implementation consequences may require specialist advice. Every source figure and assumption must be checked.
Saved analysis snapshot
Current working baseline
Refresh to read the latest locally saved Asset Schedule, Income and Needs, and Pension Analysis.
Side-by-side consequences
Scenario comparison
Capital and pension percentages are arithmetic comparisons only. Monthly positions use the latest saved affordability baseline plus the entered adjustments.
Information Still Needed
These rule-based prompts are not findings and are not published unless deliberately sent through the Review Centre.
Current case
Financial analysis
Liquidity, Tax and Implementation Analysis
Test whether a recorded scenario can be funded and implemented using clearly sourced working assumptions.
Not a tax calculation. CourtReady does not apply tax law or calculate liability. Enter only estimates supplied or checked by an appropriately qualified adviser and record their source and date. All figures remain provisional.
Working implementation plan
Liquidity assumptions
Funding and deductions
Liquidity summary
Funding gaps are arithmetic comparisons between recorded available cash and allocated costs. They are not lending or tax advice.
Implementation schedule
Costs, tax estimates and steps
| Record | Amount | Responsibility | Evidence | Due / dependency | Status | Actions |
|---|
Information Still Needed
Rule-based prompts are not tax findings or legal conclusions and are not published unless deliberately sent through the Review Centre.
Current case
Financial analysis
Updated Disclosure and Financial Change Analysis
Compare earlier and updated disclosure for each party, preserve both source positions and identify changes requiring review.
Comparison, not a finding. CourtReady records changes and review flags but does not decide whether a change is material, complete, credible or legally significant. Verify every entry against the source documents.
Change overview
Updated disclosure summary
Counts describe the working records only. A review flag is not a legal conclusion about materiality.
Party-by-party comparison
Earlier and updated positions
| Disclosure item | Earlier position | Updated position | Difference | Review status | Actions |
|---|
Combined comparison
Applicant and respondent category summary
Net movements are shown separately by category so that capital, monthly income and other unlike figures are not combined.
| Category | Applicant records | Respondent records | Material review flags | Net recorded movement |
|---|
Information Still Needed
These rule-based prompts identify incomplete source records. They are not findings and are not published unless deliberately sent through the Review Centre.
Current case
Financial disclosure analysis
Questionnaire, Replies and Outstanding Disclosure Analysis
Track each party's questionnaire, replies and supplemental replies, promised documents, court-ordered deadlines and unresolved disclosure points.
Neutral working schedule. CourtReady identifies recorded gaps, dates and potential inconsistencies. It does not decide whether a question is proportionate, a reply is adequate, an objection is valid or a party has complied with an order.
Overall position
Questionnaire and replies summary
Counts describe the working records only and do not constitute findings about compliance.
Question-by-question review
Questions, replies and document production
| Question | Wording | Reply | Status | Documents | Deadline | Actions |
|---|
Separate party analyses
Applicant and respondent questionnaire positions
| Questionnaire direction | Recorded | Answered | Outstanding | Overdue | Potential discrepancies |
|---|
Combined analysis
Outstanding disclosure schedule
Items are ordered by deadline where recorded. This schedule is a working aid and must be checked against the questionnaires, replies and court order.
| Question | Topic | Outstanding position | Documents | Deadline | Priority | Review note |
|---|
Record Information Still Needed
These prompts identify incomplete source recording. They are not findings about the adequacy of disclosure and are not published unless deliberately sent through the Review Centre.
Current case
Settlement-position analysis
Offers, Costs and Settlement Position Analysis
Compare recorded settlement positions, litigation costs and implementation consequences without mixing protected negotiations into open court-facing material.
Privilege safeguard. Only records explicitly classified as Open can be sent to the Review Centre or included in the open-position print view. Without-prejudice, FDR and internal working records remain segregated. Classification must be checked by the user or legal adviser.
Overall position
Offers and costs summary
Indicative values combine recorded capital, pension and maintenance terms. They are comparison aids, not valuations or settlement recommendations.
Complete private register
Offers and settlement positions
| Record | Classification | Status | Applicant indicative value | Respondent indicative value | Implementation/tax | Expiry/review | Actions |
|---|
Court-facing working comparison
Open settlement positions only
Protected records are automatically excluded from this comparison.
Segregated register
Protected negotiation records
This register confirms protected records exist without transferring their terms into the Review Centre.
Record quality
Information Still Needed
These prompts concern completeness of the working record. They do not assess whether an offer is reasonable or predict a costs order.
Current case
Tell us what happenedCourtReady Investigation Workspace
Tell us what happened
Start anywhere and use ordinary language. CourtReady will organise possible important points, documents, dates, missing information and things that may need clarification.
One point at a timeEvidence-ledNothing added to your case without approval
0Facts
0Evidence
0Gaps
0Issues
0Timeline
Investigation conversation
What happened?
Current identified material
What CourtReady has noticed so far
Nothing has been identified yet. Add one material event, payment, document or concern above.
Current case
Connected informationRelationship Engine and Connected Case View
Connected information
See how important points, documents, people, assets and events are connected. A connection organises information; it does not establish legal truth or court acceptance.
Current case
Documents and other proofEvidence Workspace
Documents and evidence
Add what you already have, see what it appears connected to, and review important points that still need supporting material.
Needs attention
Evidence summary
No evidence information is recorded yet.
Current case
Review before adding to your caseReview Centre and Publishing
Check what CourtReady identified
Check the wording, edit anything that needs changing, and approve only what should be added to the selected McKenzieCMS case.